LIBERALS SHOULD HAVE TO PROVE SCIENTIFICALLY THAT THERE ARE 58 DIFFERENT GENDERS

0

It’s a simple request. Homosexual have been claiming that they are homosexual by nature. That is, their genetic makeup puts them in the same sexual character as heterosexuals even though the plumbing is all wrong. Since heterosexuals can get married, it stands to reason that a third sex like homosexuality/lesbianism should have the same rights. Nature overrides human-made moral and legal conventions. That’s the narrative.

Since the legal door was opened wide for homosexuals to get married with the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision in 2015, the door should be opened for all other genders. (I’m not sure how gender got mixed up with sex. Foreign languages have gender, not sex. I’ll leave that to the linguists to figure out.)

Here’s the problem. There are only two sexes. Only women can reproduce, but they need a man to do it. If that isn’t enough empirical evidence, then a person can’t be convinced by any rational, logical, or scientific argument. What’s in a person’s head is not what’s in his or her DNA and between their legs.

Contrary to all science, Facebook has come up with dozens of gender options that have been created out of thin air. There is not a shred of science to support any of them. The oddest thing is that the smart folks at Facebook came up with the list. This should tell you something. Sometimes smart people are stupid.

I don’t see Interspecies Sex or Adult-Child sex. But give them time. They are logically inevitable given the operating assumptions of the gender-fluid class.

A Caddo Parish Animal Shelter kennel worker is out on bond after her arrest on a charge of crimes against nature and a former CPAS employee is accused of recording the act on video.

“According to Shreveport City Jail booking records, 24-year-old Celina Ann Cabrera of Shreveport was arrested Friday after police investigated a report that she had sex with a dog and that she had videos of the act.” (KSLA News)

A mailman witnessed a man performing a sexual act with his dog in the garage. Probably the only way such an act might not be outlawed is that there is no evidence the dog consented. In William Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England (1765-1769) we find the following description of such acts: “the infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast. A crime, which ought to be strictly and impartially proved, and then as strictly and impartially punished. But it is an offense of so dark

“[T]he infamous crime against nature, committed either with man or beast. A crime, which ought to be strictly and impartially proved, and then as strictly and impartially punished. But it is an offense of so dark a nature, so easily charged, and the negative so difficult to be proved, that the accusation should be clearly made out: for, if false, it deserves a punishment inferior only to that of the crime itself.” (4.15.4.)

Homosexuality used to be a crime against nature. Not anymore. It’s a protected right, and if you refuse to acknowledge it in word or deed, you could lose your job or business.  “Bake me a gay wedding cake or get sued.” In England, you can be convicted of political heresy by quoting the Bible and preaching the gospel if you bring same-sex sexuality into the discussion.

Continue Reading

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

Trending on Liberty Alliance

STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Liberty Alliance insider.

Send this to friend