Liberal apologist argues Bergdahl didn’t desert army; army deserted him

7

by Howard Portnoy

It sounds like a Yakov Smirnoff joke, but the observation is not by Smirnoff and it’s not meant to be funny, as least intentionally. The author is Vikram J. Singh, a vice president of the “non-partisan” Center for American Progress. His explanation is part of the liberal defense of Barack Obama for what may turn out to be his most unpardonable sin as commander-in-chief: Swapping a foot soldier — and one who was a deserter at that — for five of the “worst of the worst” Guantanamo Bay terrorist detainees.

According to Singh’s rationale, Bowe Bergdahl’s behavior leaves him “just short of being a traitor.” The logical conclusion that follows is to bring Bergdahl up on disciplinary charges, but Singh argues “not so fast”:

[I]t is just as likely that Bergdahl was the one deserted by an Army that could not keep up with the mental health needs of deployed force.

Continue Reading at LibertyUnyielding.com

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

Trending on Liberty Alliance

STAY IN THE LOOP
Don't miss a thing. Sign up for our email newsletter to become a Liberty Alliance insider.