On August 27, Breitbart’s Edwin Mora reported on the testimony of a witness to the attack at the United States compound in Benghazi on September 11, 2012 which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. The witness, whom a Breitbart News reporter interviewed, was living near the compound when the attack took place.
Among other things, the witness corroborated several independent reports that the Obama administration likely provided the weapons used by the Islamists involved in the Benghazi attack. He also said that several Americans had been evacuated from the compound minutes before the first attack, because they saw about 40 armed extremists, “most likely affiliated with al-Qaeda,” approaching the embassy.
The witness was surprised to hear that Ambassador Stevens had been left behind.
“Sometimes it feels like a cheesy, cheap movie,” he said. “…like the United States intended for the ambassador to die… They sacrificed him as a scapegoat.”
Which is a conclusion I have entertained since the week of the attack. The telltale signs of something other than an enemy incursion were evident within days after the attack. This is completely discounting the notion that an anti-Muslim YouTube video that had been viewed by 17 people as of Sept. 11, 2012 had anything whatsoever to do with it.
Read more at InstigatorNews