Stuart Varney said that the media narrative seems to be that Clinton did not demonstrate any “malicious intent” by using a private email server as secretary of state.
Judge Andrew Napolitano answered that, unlike the vast majority of other cases, the federal government would not have to prove intent in the case of Mrs. Clinton’s emails.
He pointed to one specific email which he said appears to show that she purposefully violated espionage laws.
There is one email in which Mrs. Clinton says to one of her underlings: “I want that document that says ‘secret’ on it. White-out the word ‘secret’ and fax it to me from your home fax to my home fax.” That is an intention to remove a state secret from a secure location to a non-secure location. What is that called? Espionage.
Read more at Allen West Republic